“ How Long Will India Keep On Showing The Other Cheek ”

on


Pic: The Other CHEEK


“ How Long Will India Keep On Showing The Other Cheek ”
It was Mr Mohanchand Karamcnad Gandhi, the Father of the Nation who once had said that-:


“ If Somebody Slaps You On The Right Cheek, Put Your Left To Him To Receive The Other One ” .

What made him say so is something which he would be able to justify it in his own manner , but most would NOT see and find any truthful logic and meaning or any sense to the same.


India had to face many a way. Right from the 323 BC when Alexander the Great invaded India and Chanakya who saved India courtesy Chandra Gupt Maurya , to the recent of all the terrorist attack that is being done by Pakistanis Ultra Terrors’ , India has always had on the CHEEK TIGHT, RIGHT, HARD To FIGHT it’s adversities always, and to what an extent India can afford to show it’s other cheek always after getting it RIGHT from those “ HEAD-SWIRLING- BOISTEROUS-IDIOTS ” is anybody’s guess .
Frankly and truly-  IT IS ONE ‘’ FULL-TIME-FULL-SCALE-WAR ”  BETWEEN THE two-nation THAT WILL once-for-all-decide THE ISSUE AND BRING ABOUT A full-scale-peace, ELSE THERE ARE NO OPTION THAT CAN BE SEEN.
It is said that – “ A BEAUTIFUL WAR IS BETTER THAN A WORST PEACE ” , and that logic holds and reins good.
India had always the TWO-CHEEKS-FULL. Whether it won the war or it lost India always had to gulp the bitterness of the war losing it on the DIPLOMATIC SCALE and ending at last by scratching it’s head. It happened in 1962 when the FOLLY of Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru made us to lick the pills rather than gulping it, and then again in the two that followed in 1965 and again in 1971 .

For we might have  won the wars’ against our so called the “ DEAREST-PET ” , “PAKKU ”  across the border and staying across the border as our neighbours but we were gulped diplomatically as we could not resist the international pressure to lose our identity as a clear winner of the war.


“ Interlarding and juxtaposing might be the  efficacies of the high-handedness of those who rule the nation but  letting them GO without fixing  any account and holding responsible for the same are nothing short and sort of TERMING OURSELF AS A CHICKEN-HEARTLESS- ORGASMS without any BONES within the body and that makes India the MOST UNCOUNTABLE IDENTITIES when it comes to the same”.

The Iraq-US war in  1991 saw the US finding NO CLUE about  “ FIVE ” US ARMY personnel.When asked to Saddam by President Bush, - WHERE ARE THEY, he could’nt reply . The US under President Bush clearly said to Saddam- ENJOY , TILL WE BREAK YOUR BODY FROM FIVE DIFFERENT PLACE TO SETTLE THE ACCOUNT. They did it in style when they BROKE him from FIVE different parts of his body to settle their issue once for ever. The US terms it as “ HIGH-FIVE ” of Saddam.


No nation had the history to face as many wars as India did . From 323 BC when Alexander invaded India to the EVERYDAY WAR that we are FIGHTING against Pakistan , we have lost the count of attacks that has been done on India. Has any country been INVADED so many a times as it is being done on India. I think after India the next that stands on it’s list is USSR then and now “ RUSSIA”

Prominence : India Gains It, But Is It Really “ PROMINENT ” , “ HOT-PURSUIT ” THEORY FAILS.


 “ As India gains prominence on the global stage, it must emulate the Russian strategy of being ruthless towards its enemies “.

As large, prosperous countries, Russia and India don’t covet foreign territory and rarely initiate wars. Both have the same common logic-  PEACE IS BETTER THAN CONFLICT.  On the contrary, each has been subject to numerous invasions over the centuries. Both countries have fought “ cataclysmic-heinous-blood-splitting” wars that have shaped their geography as well as history. However, they differ not only in the conduct of their wars but also in the policy of hot pursuit, which is the undeniable right of the defending side.

Frankly, the THEORY of HOT-PURSUIT by India totally fails. The ONLY-ONE that we did it was the BALAKOT which we should have done it a 1000 times between 1989 till this time, WE DID NOT and the WORLD LAUGHS AT US.

The Russians, The US – They Do Not Mince Either The Words Or The Opportunity

The studies reveals the truth and it reflects the same image.The US and the Russians now and the USSR then, they DO NOT MINCE WORDS OR THE OPPORTUNITIES. They strike and strike it  with VENGEANCE and “ VIZINFINITY ” when it comes to defending their constitutional right that  takes care of it’s geographical territory.


 Russian Way Of Treating Their Opponent, Decimate the Attackers-:

It is just the ORDERS that the Russian Army waits to hear it from their President and Russia/USSR had always the President which have been HARD, very hard, but NEVER the HARD-BOILED-CHOCOLATES”  The HARDEST form of any element is the DIAMOND which is a FORM of CARBON and that is what the RUSSIAN/USSR President have been. Very HARD like the DIAMOND to SHINE and OFCOURSE the Carbon leaves the BLACK-STAIN on the part of the body as well . That is the way they have dealt with their opponents.

While Russians usually decimate their attackers, ensuring that the enemy will think thrice before repeating his misadventure, India seems overly keen to offer the olive branch when destroying the enemy and taking the war into his heartland would have been the sensible decision.

Case Studies: The Russian and the Indian methodology of fighting the war

The following case studies from both ancient and modern history offer a peek into the nature of war fighting in Russia and India. Hopefully, the next generation of Indian political leadership will not fritter away the gains made by the soldiers on the battlefield.


 “ Semiramis and her tragic mistake ” 

History has many a tale to offer  of the attacks made on India by her enemies and it is a RESEARCH work that provides me to trace and track the first of a such an attack made on India by the SEMIRAMIS


One of the earliest recorded attacks on India was by Semiramis, who ruled the Assyrian Empire during the years 811-806 BCE – or nearly 500 years before the invasion of Alexander of Macedon. According to the accounts of ancient Greek historians Diodorus and Ctesias, the warrior queen “resolved to subjugate the Indians on hearing that they were the most numerous of all nations, and possessed the largest and most beautiful country in the world”.





It is an eye opener about how they prepared for the war against the Indians then and what went behind the preparartion of the war.

For two years preparations were made throughout her whole kingdom – modern day Iraq, Egypt, Turkey and parts of Central Asia. In the third year she collected 3,000,000 foot soldiers, 500,000 horsemen and 100,000 chariots. Beside these, 100,000 camels were covered with the sewn skins of black oxen and fitted with fake movable trunks in order to trick the Indians into believing that she had a large elephant corps as well.

According to Greeks accounts, Stabrobates, the king of the Indians, awaited the Assyrians on the bank of the Indus with an even larger force gathered from the whole of India. (Due to the peculiar Greek orthography we’ll probably never know his actual name. Perhaps Satyabrata. Indian records, if any, are lost.). Anyway, anything very GOOD and BEST for India has been wiped off from the books of HISTORY for the Indians to read that and know them- THANKS to the HR MINISTER who got that coveted post by           “ LICKING” the “ SHIT ” of that “ N-G ” family whenever the Congress did rule this nation.

When Semiramis approached, Stabrobates sent messengers to meet her with the complaint that she was making war upon him though he had done her no wrong. In his letter he reproached her licentious life, and calling the gods to witness, threatened to crucify her if victorious.

Semiramis read the letter, laughed, and said that the Indians would find out her virtue by her actions. The fleet of the Indians lay ready for battle on the Indus. “ Semiramis caused her ships to be put together, manned them with her bravest warriors, and, after a long and stubborn contest, the victory fell to her share. A thousand ships of the Indians were sunk and many prisoners taken.”

Stabrobates, pretending flight, led his army back from the Indus, but in reality he wished to induce the enemy to cross the river. When the massive Assyrian army passed over the Indus, Stabrobates wondered how they had procured so many elephants. The mystery was soon solved when some defectors from the enemy side told the Indians these were decoys.

Ensuing Battle and that was that

 “ In the ensuing battle, the soldiers of Semiramis resisted only a short time before the Indian elephants caused an immense slaughter. The Assyrians left their ranks and fled, and the king pressed forward against Semiramis. His arrow wounded her arm, and as she turned away his javelin struck her on the back. The wounded Semiramis escaped over the bridge to the other side of the Indus. “The Indians was warned by signs from heaven and their interpretation by the seers not to cross the river.” After exchanging prisoners Semiramis returned. She had lost two-thirds of her army ”.

Tragedy at Tarain Fifteen Attacks One-By-One


The Arabians always had that in mind and they always saw a HUGE-TREASURE of WEALTH in India. That was the only one kind of a mindset to attack India. It was such that- ATTACK INDIA AND LOOT HER WEALTH. That wealth will make the Arabians RICH and swim in the sea of PROSPERITY.

Arabs had been trying to invade India since the year 638 CE. However, it took them nearly seven decades to defeat the small, nearly barren and outermost kingdom of Sindh and that happened because of dissension in the Indian kingdom. Maulana Abdul Kalam Azad in his ‘Humanity at Death's Door’ and Maulana Nadvi in his ‘Indo-Arab Relations’, write that between 638 CE and 711 CE, the Arabs launched as many as 15 attacks against Sindh by land and via sea. And it was only the last by Mohammed Bin Qasim in 711 that succeeded.

The Indian heartland continued to resist the Islamic armies for centuries. However, that was about to change.

In 1191 CE, Mohammad Ghori, the ruler of Afghanistan, invaded India but was defeated after a fierce battle in Tarain, near Delhi, by Prithviraj Chauhan, the ruler of Ajmer. Ghori was captured and should have been put to death for bringing death and destruction to India but Prithviraj, against the advice of his commanders and ministers, magnanimously let him go.

The Afghan returned in 1192 with an even bigger army, but Prithviraj did not treat the matter as urgent. He refused to recall his main army which was fighting in Bengal – a thousand miles to the east. The Indian king said he would lead his auxiliary army himself, instead of recalling his two leading commanders – who had defeated Ghori the previous year – from Bengal.

Between the FIRST battle when Prithiviraj Chauhan had let Ghori go, and the as so called the SECOND FIERCE battle, there were as many as 15 very small but HEINOUS in nature kind of a battle that Mohammed Ghori fought against Prithiviraj Chauhan and he ie Chauhan  defeated him in all the battle. Everytime Ghori pleaded for his life and Chauhan everytime gave it. This set a TEMPO in the mind of Chauhan that Ghori could be defeated at will and ease and that is why he did not recall his BEST of the TRAINED ARMY personnel who were fighting at Bengal to accompany him for the SECOND MOST DRASTIC battle against him.

In the Second Battle of Tarain, Prithviraj initially had the upper hand but as per Hindu tradition he ordered his army to cease fighting after dusk. This saved the Muslim army from being slaughtered yet again, and they used the reprieve to launch a sneak attack at night. After defeating the Indians they captured and blinded Prithviraj, ending Hindu dominance over north-western India for the next 700 years.


Battling the British the wrong way

It can rightly be said about the British that they lost every battle in India except the last one. Their wars with the major Indian kingdoms such as the Marathas and Sikhs comprised three wars. The British would invariably lose the first two because of superior Indian bravery, numbers and tactics. The British would sue for peace when facing natural defeat and even death at times. Everytime that they did that everytime the Indian rulers fell onto their  whimsical prey and conceded to their demand .This gave the Britishers to sigh some relief and breathe better to launch yet another attack on the Indian rulers.

The Britishers would sincerely study about the weakness for their defeat but on the other hand the Indian rulers would be taken by the PROMISES tall but NEVER to follow by the Britishers .

The repulsive attack again would await the Indian rulers and they would have to again fight the war.That slowly would weaken their base and the strength of their economy .This is how slowly but surely the Indian rulers started becoming weal and slowly their strength started waning but the Britishers would onduct a ANALYTICAL studies about WHAT MADE THEM TO LOOSE

They would then  revamp themselves to take on the Indian rulers by some new technique and would come up again with a brand which would include vengeance and NO respite at all for any PEACE or any agreement at all that left the indian rulers to being either a PRISONER OF WAR to them or face DEATH by the way the Britishers felt it suited them.

Pic:: J.C. Stadler. Battle of Assaye (1815)

After each war the British would do the following: One, try and divide the Indian commanders. Two, bribe key generals to stay out of the next battle. Three, learn the weaknesses of the Indian armies. Four, acquire fresh troops from England and Scotland. Five, reverse engineer captured Indian weapons and return with new improved versions to use against Indian armies.

Like dominoes, the Indian kingdoms fell one by one. Alliances rarely lasted. Nobody except the Marathas thought fit to build a navy. Even the Maratha navy, which was undefeated by the Dutch, British, Portuguese and French, fell victim to the machinations of the Marathas commanders who feared the rise of a competing navy.


No forward policy:: all IRRESPONSIBLE THEORY  

Examining just these three case studies, one gets the picture that Indian armies rarely if ever chased the enemy back into his territory. It is clear that Indians are brilliant in battle and irresponsible at war.

Despite five centuries of invasions (from around 638 CE to 1191 CE which resulted in huge casualties and enslavements of hundreds of thousands of Indians) no expeditionary army was assembled by a coalition of kingdoms to strike at the enemy in his nest. Had India conducted pre-emptive raids into Central Asia and Persia, these bordering regions would have never have become launch pads for invasions.

Well-known lawyer and former Law Minister Ram Jethmalani writes about this lack of forward policy among Indians. About the invasion of Sindh, which again is a stark example of a victorious Indian kingdom refusing to the eradicate the enemy before he came dangerously close, Jethmalani says that after Sindh finally fell to the Arabs in 711 CE and despite the horrendous destruction that ensued, the Indian kingdoms to the east did not come together to free their Sindhi brethren:



“ Rest of the Indians across the borders of Sindh were doubtless aware of the Arab conquest. It produced not a ripple on the quiet waters of their placid existence. Life went on as usual. There was neither a sense of territorial loss, nor an understanding of the nature of the new menace. The conquest of Sindh was dismissed as one more dacoity. Nearly 500 years elapsed before Mohammed Ghori and his marauding hordes descended on India in 1192 A.D. The whole of northern India was made a tributary to the Ghor Dynasty. Muslim power in India had come to stay. Five centuries went by, but the country did not wake up or prepare to do or die. It is a shameful and tragic tale.”

Jethmalani explains the causes of this inertia: “Afflicted by a debilitating pacifism, corroded by the idea of nonviolence, Indians seemed to have left it to professional soldiers to fight the invaders. The rest of the people lifted not one finger to defend their homeland. Invaders who thirsted for the tremendous wealth of India and its delicate and  “ beautiful women ” never met the resistance that the nation could have generated. The only strong resistance that was offered came from the proud Rajputs, the descendants of the invading Huns of the earlier days. But even this heroic resistance proved temporary and collapsed by reason of internecine rivalry – a perennial disease of Hindu India, ancient and modern.”


Russian way: Making them eat horsemeat

From the defeat of the dreaded Mongols to Alexander Nevsky’s “ Massacre on Ice ” of the Swedes, there are numerous instances of Russian overthrow of the foreign yoke. But let’s look at more recent victories.

Following the rejection of his Continental System by Tsar Alexander I, French Emperor Napoleon ordered his Grande Armee into Russia. This enormous army numbered 680,000 soldiers, half of them French and the other half comprising Germans, Poles and several other nationalities of the French Empire.

As Napoleon was a brilliant commander and a genius strategist, the Russian generals knew that in a head-on clash the superior Grand Armee would simply roll over the less experienced Russian army. The Russians therefore resorted to “strategic retreat”.



Pics :: Adolph Northen. Napoleon's retreat from Moscow

After a few minor defeats on the border, the Russian army fell back while the Cossacks were given the task of burning villages, towns and crops. This scorched-earth policy was intended to deny the invaders the option of living off the land. Starvation and privation compelled French soldiers to leave their camps at night in search of food. These men became easy targets for roving bands of Cossacks.

The Russian army retreated into the vast country for almost three months before agreeing to fight one of history’s most indecisive battles. The Battle of Borodino, which took place west of Moscow, was a  “ Pyrrhic ” victory for the French as they lost 49 irreplaceable generals and tens of thousands of soldiers, although the Russians lost more men.

As the Russian army resumed its old tactic of strategic retreat, the French entered Moscow only to see the Russians had abandoned their spiritual capital after setting fire to it. It left Napoleon with only one option.

The French retreat was anything but orderly. It became disastrous when a cleverly timed Russian attack forced the Grand Armee to veer into the corridor stripped of food by both armies. It suffered continual harassment from the Cossacks, peasants and a merciless Russian army.

The fording of rivers became an especially hazardous activity for Napoleon’s troops as Russian forces would converge on them during these crossings. Thousands died due to cold and hunger. It is said only 27,000 soldiers were still standing when the once mighty Grand Armee re-entered France. Of these, only 16,000 would ever fight again.

During their retreat, the French cavalry had ceased to exist because horses had become food. When General Kutuzov had taken command of the Russian army during the middle of the war, he had promised Russia: "I made the Turks eat horsemeat. Give me some time, and the French shall too! Take my word for it, I'll make them eat horsemeat!"


Hitler’s fatal mistake : “ SANDWICHED ”

One of the MOST  and the GRAVEST mistake that Hitler did was to attack UUSR/Russia when the entire USSR was reeling under a temperature of about MINUS 45 DEGREE CENTIGRADE.


The German Army had to cut through Great Britain to enter Russia. When they entered Great Britain, the Germans caused  such a HUGE destruction that Great Britain was about EIGHTY-PERCENT DEAD and OVER.


Thinking that Great Britain was OUT for the COUNT and was a USELESS “ CHICK ” that would be TASTELESS even to taste it for anything, leaving Great Britain alive thinking and hoping that IT IS FINISHED FOR EVER, the MIGHTY German Army entered Russia in that weather which was TOO MUCH for them to bear.


The LASH that the German gave to the Russian was something that WOULD NEVER HAPPEN AGAIN IN THE HISTORY OF ANY WAR.


The clever and the INTELLIGENT USSR/Russian straight away started moving to it’s COLDEST place at Siberia and the German gave it a HOT PURSUIT. Finding the weather TOO COLD to bear the Germans under Hitler  passed an  order to its Army to come back saying that it would again attack the Russian when the weather gets better


While coming back the Germans had to come back through Britain. Britain knew that if the Germans were given any BREATHE again then again while crossing over to Russia from  Britain it would FINISH OFF the Britain and it’s empire. Britain with the HELP of Indian Soldiers who were FIGHTING for them in the World War- II attacked with RENEWED VIGOUR and the Russian while pursuiting the Germans attacked the Germans from the TOP. Britain was attacking from the bottom.


The Germans were SANWICHED  and ultimately they had to lay their arms down. In the long run it took away the life of Adolf Hitler as he had to commit suicide.

A hundred and twenty nine years later, German Chancellor Adolf Hitler decided he would succeed where Napoleon couldn’t. In 1941 he invaded Russia with a German Army in excess of 3.8 million battle hardened troops. After suffering heavy early losses, the Russians counterattacked, ending Hitler’s dream of global domination.

From 1941 to the end of World War II in May 1945, the Germans lost 5,318,000 soldiers. Of these, 80 per cent died on the Russian front. Around three million German prisoners of war (POWs) were captured by Russia. The POWs were marched through the streets of Moscow, Kiev and other Soviet cities. This treatment not only broke the spirits of these soldiers but also satisfied the local population which was thirsting for revenge at the want on death and destruction caused by the invaders. These POWs were employed as forced labour in the Soviet wartime economy and post war reconstruction.


Depending on which side you believe, between 350,000 and one million German Army POWs died in NKVD camps. According to Russian historian Grigori F. Krivosheev, 2,733,739 German POWs taken and 381,067 died in captivity. British historian Richard Overy estimates 356,000 out of 2,880,000 German prisoners of war died in labour camps. For instance, of the 91,000 soldiers of the Sixth Army that surrendered after the Battle of Stalingrad, only 6,000 of them lived to be repatriated after the war.

PICS :: A wounded German POW taken at the Battle of Stalingrad.

Did these POWs deserve better treatment? Why don’t you decide. Of the 5,000,000 Soviet soldiers captured by the German armies, the majority did not make it home. The Nazis deliberately starved 3.1 million of the prisoners to death.

When the Red Army soldiers liberated their territories, they were overcome with rage at seeing their once beautiful country turned into a wasteland. As many as 1700 towns and 70,000 villages had been razed. As many 16 million Soviet civilians were killed in addition to the 10 million who died in uniform. The scale of barbarity of the Germans is unparalleled in modern history.

In order to make Germany pay, Stalin took its eastern half and turned it into a communist state. According to historian David Glantz, he created a system of buffer and client states which included Bulgaria, Romania, Hungary, Poland and Czechoslovakia to insulate Russia from any possible future attack. Russia’s action ensured that Germany would never be a threat to Europe.


Inexplicable tolerance

Compare Stalin’s strong actions with how India treated the 97,000 Pakistan Army soldiers captured during the 1971 war. These soldiers had surpassed the Nazis in killing efficiency. While it took the Germans 12 years to murder six million Jews, the Pakistan Army killed three million of its own Bengali citizens in just eight months. And yet when the Indian Army liberated Bangladesh, not one of these war criminals was brought to trial.





When Mr Kosygin had come to India to sign the FRIENDSHIP TREATY between USSR/RUSSIA then he sked Mrs Indira Gandhi: Why’s that you are TREATING the “POW’S” of Pakistan as HERO, she had NO answer


He again asked if you want to treat them as your HERO by according them a HERO-LIKE-TREATMENT, then why have you to FEAR about signing a FRIENDSHIP TREATY with the USSR.She again was SPEECHLESS Anyway, inspite of being very DISSATISFIED for the sake of India , it's people and the keep the Western power at Bay to prevent them helping Pakistan to sway at Kashmir, the USSR Premier then signed the TWENTY YEARS FRIENDSHIP TREATY with India which prevented the western Countries to poke their nose in the matter of Kashmir and that really saved Mrs Indira Gandhi, the Congress and their skin.


 On the contrary, they were housed, fed and protected from the anger of the Bengali people. This BBC clip shows 25,000 Pakistani soldiers in Dhaka being “guarded from possible Bengali vengeance by the men with whom less than a fortnight ago they were at war”.

Instead of being held accountable for their crimes before Bangladeshi tribunals, the Pakistani soldiers were transported in heavily guarded trains to India. “At every step they were protected by Indian soldiers had it proved necessary. The Bengalis are not pleased to see their enemies go home apparently scot free.”

This had INFURIATED the Bengalis across our BORDER and they had VOWED that they would TEACH India a lesson when it would matter. Ever since then they have been doing it and the WORST came in 1999 when 13 of the BSF Soldiers were caught at the Bangladesh Border by the Bangladesh  Security Force.They chopped/slit  the THROAT of those 13 Indian soldiers and INVERSELY tying them to the bamboo closed and crossed  over and threw them at the Indian border when Mr Atal Behari Vajapayee was our       “ PM ”

In 1971 the CEO of then the Indian Army Mr Maneckshaw also showed some of it’s GRACIOUSNESS to these POW’s which was NOT taken in the best of the SPIRIT by the Bengalis across the border .

India’s top commander Sam Maneckshaw personally visited these POWs, enquiring about their welfare and comfort. When one of them hesitated to shake hands, saying he was a humble toilet cleaner, Manekshaw replied, “We are both soldiers,” and grabbed the Pakistani soldier’s hand.

The Indian political leadership committed a huge strategic blunder by letting the enemy off the hook without extracting a price. That 97,000 Pakistani troops were languishing in India was a huge dent to its pride. It was the opportune time to settle the Kashmir issue in India’s favour. Just like Stalin fixed post-war European boundaries in favour of Russia, Poland and Czechoslovakia at Germany’s expense, Prime Minister Indira Gandhi should have told Pakistan to surrender all claims to Kashmir. She DID NOT DO THAT NOT AT ALL.

Frankly- she DID it t PLEASE the MUSLIM VOTERS here at India .

Instead, not only were the POWs allowed to return home on vague assurances of peace by Pakistani Prime Minister Z.A. Bhutto, but 58 Indian soldiers believed to be in Pakistani POW camps were not repatriated. Islamabad, however, refuses to acknowledge these Indian soldiers were ever lodged in its jails.

War is a dirty business. One way to prevent it is to let your enemies know you will make them pay a heavy price for it. Soft targets lead to 1965, 1971, Kargil, Mumbai, Uri, Pathankot, mind you Mr Modi, mind you the Indian Rulers.

Be a USSR when it comes to it .However we KNOW INDIA CANNOT and that is where the Indians will HAVE to PAY like Adolf Hitler and the Germans had to pay .

SOFT AND TENDERLY LOVE IS GOOD IN THE      “ BED ” and NOT when you RULE the NATION.

The list1965, 1971, Kargil, Mumbai, Uri, Pathankot will go on as long as India shows the other cheek.

INDIA HAS BEEN FAMOUS SHOWING THE “OTHER” CHEEK

Regards





























Pics

Shyamal Bhattacharjee






































Mr Shyamal Bhattacharjee, the author was born at West Chirimiri Colliery at District Surguja, Chattisgarh on July 6th 1959 He received his early education at Carmel Convent School Bishrampur and later at Christ Church Boys' Higher Secondary School at Jabalpur. He later joined Hislop College at Nagpur and completed his graduation in Science and he also added a degree in    B A thereafter. He joined the HITAVADA, a leading dailies of Central India at Nagpur as a      Sub-Editor ( Sports ) but gave up to complete his MBA in 1984 He thereafter added a Diploma In Export Management. He has authored THREE books namely Notable Quotes and Noble Thought published by Pustak Mahal in 2001 Indian Cricket : Faces That Changed It  published by Manas Publications in 2009 and Essential Of Office Management published by NBCA, Kolkatta  in 2012. He has a experience of about 35 years in marketing

Comments

Post a Comment