The " HINDU " Symbol “ SWASTIKA ” : A progressive symbol for ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT and never of a “ HATRED-ISM ”

Pic-: 

The " HINDU " Symbol “ SWASTIKA ” : A progressive symbol for ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT and never of a “ HATRED-ISM ”

As it is and as they always do- IT IS ANOTHER ATTEMPT TO MALIGN THE BELIEF OF HINDUISM

The AMERICAN CHRISTENDOM is now on it’s feet again and is on the move to malign the very PIOUS symbol of SWASTIK that the HINDUS believe in and use it as the symbol of economical prosperity.

Swastik in it’s pure  form represent PROFIT and it infacts symbolizes the COMING OF THE PIOUS WITH ALL SORT OF PROFIT

The businessman inscribe this symbol on their books of accounts and the shopkeepers inscribe that on the left and the right hand side of their shops at the entrance.

This only signifies all about good things that could be envisaged as the prosperity to happen and that the profit would be the base of everything that is there for the human beings and especially the business to flounder and prosper with.

This has nothing to do with HATREDISM and the one’s who always believe in belittling the HINDUS have merged it with the Hitler’s sign  of HAKENKREUZ and this has nothing to do anything with that or with it.

I shall represent an article here with the snapshot’s with my own lines of belief at the points wherever it is necessary to indicate what has been the crux and the reality and the variances that occurs.

First to start with the American snapshots-:

Pic- : The Election Sign Of The " DEMOCRAT " 

Snapshot

·         American Christendom is at it again.

Spearheaded by the “ Democrats ” , it is now trying to re-vilify the Swastika as a        ' symbol of hate ', through a legislation, without telling the world that Hitler's Hakenkreuz has nothing to do with the Indic symbol of peace and prosperity.

Here I would like to say that Hitler used this symbol when he was the ruler of Gewrmany but this symbol which is Swastik is there since the start of the 5000nd century.The Hindus then had discovered this symbol through a kind of a worship to their god and had received this symbol from their God whom they performed their worship for as the symbol for PEACE, HAPPINESS and PROSPERITY

Swastika controversy has come back again.

The US Senator Todd Kaminsky has sponsored the New York State Senate Bill SS6648.

The Bill is co-sponsored by Senators Joseph Addabbo Jr, Alessandra Biaggi, John E. Brooks and David Carlucci — all Democrats.

The Bill requires that students through ' the curricula for grades six through twelve ' should be instructed regarding what it calls ‘symbols of hate.'

The Bill, which has already ' passed Senate ’ states:

In particular, it is vital for students to be aware of the meanings of the swastika commonly exhibited as the emblem of Nazi Germany — as well as the noose — commonly exhibited as a symbol of racism and intimidation.

I shall lay the entire CONCEPT of the NAZI and their belief on and about the CROSS which came to them much before but which was made to them to believe as per the HITLER RULE and it's theory.

The Great Scandal: Christianity's Role in the Rise of the Nazis

The " GREAT" Scandal :: Christianity's Role In The Time Of The Rise Of The " NAZIS " 

Hitler never used any Swastika, and did not even know the word “swastika”. Never used this word in his whole life. There was not even a single “swastika" anywhere in Nazi germany. Check all Nazi primary sources, in original German, but avoid the English (mis)translations. Hitler was a German, and used a native German symbol, which he took from medieval Teutonic knight symbols in 1920. Hitler has left a handwritten note saying so. This handwritten note by Hitler, from 1920, with drawings of the symbol drawn by Hitler, has been published, and is easily available at various places on the internet. The original paper is preserved by German government in the Bavarian finance ministry in Munich, and it still exists.

This symbol is called “hakenkreuz” in German, and all nazis always called it hakenkreuz. Germans before nazis also called it hakenkreuz, and Germans still call it hakenkreuz. This nazi symbol has no other origin. Hitler chose the symbol for his party in 1920, so, only Hitler gets to say where he got the Nazi symbol. And Hitler says he got it from Teutons, and links it to Christianity. End of discussion!

You can see the handwritten note in the lower part of this translated German Wikipedia article, and also see a translated version of what Hitler wrote, in the caption below that image. Go to section: Anti-Semitic and racist use, and then, to sub-section National socialism.

Please read the whole sub-section of German Wikipedia article to understand the Christian aspects of the Nazi symbol, the Nordic-race aspects of the Nazi symbol, and see it explain, with proof, that it is not related to India or Hindus. You will see Hitler say things like

…it is the political effect of what Christianity actually wants

Now I get back to the THEORY of " OURE" Hinduism and this is what I have to ascribe and describe it in brief-:  

Here I would clearly like to specify that the symbol Swastik for the Hindus and the Hinduism is neither a sign for hate nor for anything which we call it a racism.It is purely used as a symbol for PEACE, HAPPINESS and PROSPERITY which if culminated in to a single meaning becomes PROFIT for the one’s and profit for the business.

Already 'American Hindus Against Defamation' (AHAD), an initiative of Viswa Hindu Parishad of America (VHPA) has rightly protested against this Bill for the danger posed by the ignorance of not differentiating between the Swastika and the Nazi Hakenkreuz.

Utsav Chakrabarty, Director of Advocacy and Awareness (VHPA), had succinctly expressed the Vedic-Buddhist-Jain view of the matter thus:

We acknowledge the horrid way the swastika has been misused and misinterpreted. Even though Hitler never used the word “Swastika”, and instead used the same symbol, calling it Hakenkreuz, for the past 70 years, the Swastika continues to remain a vilified and maligned symbol. This must be corrected. Instead of censoring the symbol, we must celebrate the positive history of it. We must reclaim it from Hitler and the followers of his hateful ideology. This wrong must be righted.

Belgian Indologist Dr. Koenraad Elst has pointed out, how in 1955, when Sri Lanka and later India in 1977 demanded that they use Red Swastika in the place of Red Cross, the International Red Cross killed that ‘eminently sensible and secular proposal.’

The Red Cross in a way also uses the Swastik emblem and it crearted many a wrong impression in the mind of the people that Swastik has many a things to do with the FREE- SERVICE and that sort of a thing for humanity.

However at that time the organization that represented the Hindus in the world over, came across and made the things clear for the World at large to take the symbols of the Red Cross Society and the symbols for the reasons that the Hindu’s use in a different manner and in a different way. That somehow could make the world at large at that point of time  to really feel the difference that the symbols ever had but now THANKS to the DEMOCRATS to confuse the World and throw a SLUR on the Hindus world over to be a discriminated figure- none for nothing and for nothing at all.

In his book ‘ Return of the Swastika: Hate and Hysteria versus Hindu Sanity ’ (2007), Dr. Elst points out an important fact — that the West has been in no way ignorant of the auspicious and benign dimension of Swastika and the absolutely twisted way in which Nazis misappropriated this ancient symbol.

Canada Has a Town Named “ SWASTIK ”

Elst even points out how a town in Ontario, Canada, is named ‘Swastika’.

The people there resisted the name change even during the Second World War fervour when the government wanted to name it Winston after Churchill.

The community retort was: ' To Hell with Hitler. We had the Swastika first.'

Behind the aggressive and widespread promotion of Swastika as the Nazi symbol by the West, there may be a collective guilt and transference.

The presence of Hakenkreuz in the monastery at the town of Lambach where Hitler grew has been already documented in the 2018 article 'True Indology ' wrote on the 'Evangelical defamation Of Hindu symbol.'

One of Hitler's biographers, Robert Payne, points out that Hitler had mentioned his fascination with the Abbot — as a future ideal for himself.

The Abbot of Lamnach monastery, Theodorich von Hagen, who headed it during the fifties and sixties of the 19th century, had made Hakenkreuz part of his coat of arms.

Hitler could see from the window of his father's apartment the Hakenkreuz, and according to Robert Payne, it was this hooked cross of Theodorich von Hagen that            ‘ probably ’ later became the Nazi Hakenkreuz.

There are quite a few historians who differ with regard to the Hakenkreuz of Lambach influencing Hitler’s later Nazi insignia.

Wrong Principles Followed : Hurting the belief of Hinduism

Pic - :  The Sign Of Hinduism Belief and it's belief 

There have been many symbols which were either wrongly used or made a toll for misrepresentation by the different communities. This they did only to confuse the living beings and put a kind of a wrong belief so that they opposed the would become vehement to take on the atrocity that one would have felt to get it out from these kind of a community. Hitler did not use this cross for that reason as he was never sure of and he never knew how this could be used against the sentiments of the Hindus as he was unaware and was not at all concerned with Hinduism. But of late many a community for the sake of sowing the seed of hatreds’ in the minds of the people of India are using it to divide the Hindus and delaminate them for everything. This is a wrong principle followed and is detrimental to the cause and belief of Hinduism.

It should also be remembered that apart from the intentional and mischievously wrong identification of hooked cross as Swastika, there are other symbols of hatred like the Iron Cross and the Burning Cross of the Ku Klux Klan.

The common theme that connects the hooked cross or Hakenkreuz and Iron cross of the Nazis and the burning cross of Ku Klux Klan is actually the Cross!

It is this persistent and historic resurfacing of the cross as a symbol of movements that are explicit and indefensibly intolerant and hate-filled, which makes the West shift this blame to Swastika — thus Christianity could claim deniability to the hatred that is central to the Nazi and KKK movements — the hatred which has an umbilical relation to the very core of evangelical Christian theology.

Prof. Daniel Rancour-Laferriere, Emeritus Professor of Russian University of California, Davis, in his exhaustively scholarly book 'The Sign of the Cross: From Golgotha to Genocide' (Routledge, 2017) has brought out this truth in an uncompromising manner.

He pointedly asks:

The fact is, however, the hooked cross has also been one among the various types of crosses which have been utilised by Christians within the specifically Christian context. Why, then, call it a “swastika” when dealing with this context? In particular, why risk offending Hindus, Buddhists, and some other groups by utilising their term, especially “after Auschwitz?” Why not recognise the Nazi Hakenkreuz for the Christian word and the Christian image that it is? The most accurate and culturally applicable translation of this term in post-Holocaust English is hooked cross.

Daniel Rancour-Laferriere, The Sign of the Cross, Taylor & Francis, 2017 [Kindle]

Prof. Rancour-Laferriere also argues against the Christian apologetic stand that the hooked cross predates Christianity, pointing out that even the other Christian crosses predate Christianity, but that fact does not make them non-Christian objects.

The professor points out further that Hitler himself, in a speech made in 1930, said that the hooked cross as Nazi party symbol was ‘a political expression of his goal to unite the two major Christian confessions (Catholicism and Protestantism) within Germany. It was a continuation of what the Christian cross represented, namely, the “struggle” against the Jews.’

In certain countries times immemorial- this sign was used to signify as the symbol for a victory obtained in a war. In countries like Hungary, Italay, France and some other countries in the Scandinavians, this sign was used to send a signal or a message to their rulers that their nation has either won a battle or a  war. This was it and this is how it became. However now it is that the Democtrats are using this to bemuse or either confuse the people and their mind with a kind of a thought which are very detrimental and dangerous for the humanity and humanism. Thay are interpolating this to use as a sign of hatred by the Hindus which are totally wrong.

The most important aspect of the problem comes after the Holocaust and how Christendom was reacting towards its responsibility for this crime against humanity. Prof. Rancour-Laferriere explains:

The cross as a sign of victory over death was co-opted by Christian political and military leaders in order to promote another kind of victory, namely, military victory in wars against non-Christian and even against Christian enemies. The Crusades, for example, were “wars of the cross.” Muslims, Jews, heretics, pagans, and various others were attacked by military forces under the sign of the Christian cross. The Holocaust is the latest and most thoroughly victorious war won against those perceived as enemies of the cross (six million Jews are counted among the victims). The cross in this case was the hooked cross, which has been utilized continuously in Christian iconography since pre-Constantinian Christians included it along with other crosses (equilateral Greek cross, chi-rho cross) in the catacombs of Rome. The Nazi hooked cross was not a Hindu “swastika,” for the Roman Catholic dictator, and failed artist Adolf Hitler probably created it on the basis of the hooked crosses he had observed in his childhood while studying in the Benedictine monastery of Lambach. Given the long history of persecution and violence associated with the Christian sign of the cross, educated Christians face a serious psychological hindrance to the expression of reverence for the chief symbol of their own faith.

So what is the solution? The Christian discourse invented a solution that would at once cleanse Christian monopolistic theology of any guilt even as making Holocaust an added weapon against one of the most important remaining enemies of Christianity — Hindu family of religions — the last battlefield where Christianity fights against ‘paganism’.

By constantly calling the hooked cross as Swastika, Christendom has successfully put the blame for Nazi Antisemitism on Paganism.

By extension, it has also implicated Hindu Dharma. So when the children learn ‘Swastika’ and not ‘Hooked cross’ as the hate symbol, simultaneously, they will also learn about ‘ Aryan invasion of India ’ and also about the racial interpretation of so-called caste system in India.

Thus, the students will be convinced that Hinduism is somehow similar to Nazism. However it is NOT,NOT , NOT and NEVER and Nazism cannot be as similiar or anywhere similiar t Hinduism. These are some of the CROOKS that is being played by the interiors of India who wishes to demolish the Hinduism and the BJP which has a large mass base of the Hindu's and the help are being taken by the outsiders to promote these kind of an attempt to destabilise and make the Hinduism weaker and fragile. It is for the Hindus to learn this and take correct action whenever it could be.

And when the student comes out of the school and in case decides to learn Indology, she will also learn from Sheldon Pollock’s masterly woven yet false thesis that Indian Vedic religion somehow through German Indology did an internal colonization of Germany and that the Nazi movement was either the result of it or/and benefitted from it.

This will completely sanitize the immense continuity of Christian antisemitism.

What HINDUISM BELIEVE AND DOES THAT- NOBODY EVER CAN DO IT 

Nobody in this WORLD, no RELIGION and no BELIEF can ever do what the HINDUISM does it and has been doing it ever since the WORLD has come into existence.

Hinduism is the ONLY religion which does the following-:

1 ). Hinduism is the ONLY religion which WORSHIPS the STONES ,  MARBELS etc. The stones or the MARBELS on which the scripts of the GOD, GODESS or the DIETIES are carved in the temples or anywhere outside the temple the HINDUS worship it. I other words the HINDUS worship the STONES as well as the MARBEL as well if they see the scripts or the carving of the God and the Goddess that they believe in.

2 ). The HINDUS are ONLY the religion which worship the trees and the plants. the TULSI PLANT, the BANYAN TREE, the PIPAL TREE and there are a few more which the HINDUS worship with full HEART . No other religion does that.  A PURE HINDU NEVER DEMOLISHES OR DESTRUCTS THESE SPECIES OF PLANTS AD TREE.

3 ). The HINDUS are the only religion which WORSHIPS the RIVERS. Any HOLY river that flows and especially the GANGES ie the Ganga..... se and notice the way that the people worship them. The HOLY water is preserved in a manner by the HINDUS which no other would do that. THAT IS THE GREATNESS OF THE HINDU AND IT'S  RELIGION.

4 ). The HINDUS are the ONLY one who worship the BOOKS, PEN, and all STUDY material. The SARASWATI MAA POOJA is the CLASS EXAMPLE of the same.

5 ). The HINDU worship the GIRLS ie the " KANYAS " as we call them. The example of the Durga Pooja where on the last day the toddler ie the small kiddy girls are worshipped which we call it a KANYA-POOJA.

6 ).The HINDUS are the ONLY one who give a SOCIAL PRESTIGE to the PROSTITUTES. The FIRST LOATHE of the mud which is used to make the IDOL of MAA DURGA a ODDESS of the HINDUS comes from the place where the prostitures resided. A small LOATHE of ther earth where the prostitue reside is brought in and it is mixed with the clay or whatever it might be, to prepare that idol and every idol of MAA DURGA prapared has a BIT of the QUANTITY of the EARTH-MUD  of the place where or which is the residnce of the prostitues which means that the PROSTITUTES ARE ALSO A PART OF HUMANISM AND HUMANITY.

IS THERE ANY OTHER EXAMPLE OF ANY OTHER RELIGION DOING THAT

NO- NO IS THE ANSWER 

There are times when offence is the best form of defence.

Hindus should not only ask for the removal of the term Swastika and introduction of the true name hooked cross as the symbol of hatred, but more importantly, teach wherever they could that it is monopolistic- expansionist theological components like the ‘ the only saviour ’, ‘redemption solely through the wine transformed to blood’ and ‘ eternal hell ’ et cetera — which are the true breeding grounds of hatred and intolerance

That sums it all and that is it

Regards

Pic-:

Shyamal Bhattacharjee

Mr Shyamal Bhattacharjee, the author was born at West Chirimiri Colliery at District Surguja, Chattisgarh on July 6th 1959 He received his early education at Carmel Convent School Bishrampur and later at Christ Church Boys' Higher Secondary School at Jabalpur. He later joined Hislop College at Nagpur and completed his graduation in Science and he also added a degree in    B A thereafter. He joined the HITAVADA, a leading dailies of Central India at Nagpur as a      Sub-Editor ( Sports ) but gave up to complete his MBA in 1984 He thereafter added a Diploma In Export Management. He has authored THREE books namely Notable Quotes and Noble Thought published by Pustak Mahal in 2001 Indian Cricket : Faces That Changed It  published by Manas Publications in 2009 and Essential Of Office Management published by NBCA, Kolkatta  in 2012. He has a experience of about 35 years in Marketing .

Signature of Shyamal Bhattacharjee