Again Wanted " MORE "- " DELIVERED " Though It Might Be , Totally " DISSAPOINTED " At " OPERATION - SINDOOR " Cease Fire

Pic - :: All Over The World The " INDIANS " Were " UTTRLY -  DISSAPOINTED " After The Cease Fire Declaration As Everybody Wanted India And Mr Modi To Send Pakistan To The  " DUST "

Before I complete this article, to start for, I write these few lines about the war - ::

" There are never any victors in war, both sides lose and it is the families that have to pay the price and suffer the most. As someone once said ' Wars are created by politicians, compounded by bureaucrats and fought by soldiers ".

Giving " EQUAL " and due " RESPECT " to the Defense personnel of both the nation , I write - ::

“  WHAT A DRY STICK IN TERMS OF THE STRENGTH IS PAKISTAN IN EVERY MANNER ”. 

Pic - The Pictorial Representation Of The Dry Stick And That Is Pakiatan In Terms Of Its Strength 

WHY IS THAT INDIA SHOWS SO MUCH OF MERCY TO PAKISTAN ALWAYS. THAT WHOSE HANDS ARE STAINED WITH BLOOD DURING THE TIME OF THE BIRTH, ARE DRACULAS AND THEY LIVE TO  SUCK BLOOD , DO  THEY HAVE THE RIGHT TO STAY IN THE SOCIETY WHICH YEARNS FOR PEACE. THESE OUGHT TO BE COMPLETELY KILLED. PAKISTAN AS A NATION DOES NOT POSSESSES THE RIGHT TO LIVE.

WHEN WILL THE INDIAN GOVERNMENT AND THE INDIAN DEFENCE FORCE REALISE THE SAME AND DO THE ACT  TO TEACH PAKISTAN ALL THE LESSONS OF IMPROMPTU , A ART THAT THEY THRIVE ON TO ATTACK ALL ITS NEIGHBOURS ESPECIALLY INDIA AND AFGHANISTAN

Pic - :: Pakistan Receives Drubbing And Is Left To Lick " SHIT  "Always But Always Celebrates The " OWLISH - VICTORY  "

If at all there is something which has disappointed the Indian a bit or a more is that THE OPERATION SINDOOR WANTED THE INDIANS TO BELIEVE THAT  MORE OF THE AIRFORCE  BASE AND THE KARACHI PORT  OF PAKISTAN , DECIMATED BY THE INDIAN DEFENSE AND THAT WILL SCRATCH US A BIT MORE. OTHERWISE THE " 22 MINUTES " OF THE GAME PLAY BROUGHT BEFORE OUR EYE- WHAT A DRY STICK IN TERMS OF THE STRENGTH IS PAKISTAN IN EVERY MANNER. 

Pic - :: The " GREATEST - JOKER  "   , the most " TOPSY - TURVY "  in the annals of the Prime Minister of any country, and of the modern " WORLD "  for whom " DEFEAT " is " VICTORY " 

BEGGAR CANNOT ALWAYS BE THE CHOOSER - ::

For every act and for everytime that Pakistan is  decimated and demolished by India , it is Pakistan always and it had always been Pakistan who runs to the other VETO - FIVE nation to beg them to pressurise them to force the Indian authority to stop the war. Every time that India does that,  PAKISTAN TO WASH THE EYE OF ITS PUBLIC WITHOUT WATER STARTS CELEBRATING ITS VICTORY. This, everybody knows that it is an eye - wash but they have to keep their mouth shut and eye open, at Pakistan, to see how many of these nuisances would be created by their national Government to save the face of their defense force. 

HOW CAN YOU EXPECT A BEGGER TO VANQUISH AND DEMOLISH A KING AND HIS KINGDOM - ::

How can you expect a BEGGAR to fight the King to uproot the kingdom. For that  TREMENDOUS AMOUNT OF MONEY IS REQUIRED Pakistan cannot even feed itself properly, how do you expect it to vanquish everything before their eye and be a winner. It is so correctly said that - 

 BEGGAR CANNOT ALWAYS BE THE CHOOSER 

Pic - A Pictorial Of Beggar Pakistan Asking For Mercy 

A beggar’s instinct is to ask — and asking is not a strategy.

Appealing for sympathy or leverage without a plan to stand on your own two feet corrodes your

sovereignty. Diplomacy should be a tool used from a position of strength, not a makeshift crutch

to fill strategic gaps.

A nation built on entreaties will wake up one morning bargaining for survival; bargaining from a

position of weakness invites coercion. Build deterrence, capacity, and resilience so that you do

not have to extend a hand when it matters most.

Self-reliance is not arrogance; it is prudence — the only reliable currency in crisis and the

foundation of credible diplomacy.

Pic - An Example Of The Military Complexity. Military Cannot Fight A War Without PENCE AND POUNDS And Pakistan For That Matter Is A Beggar 

Essential to recognize the complexities of maintaining national security - :

Military and the militant activities in the region, it is important to approach the situation with a level-headed perspective. The continuous violence and military provocations have led to significant loss of life and human suffering, not only in India but also in Pakistan and Afghanistan. However, advocating for the complete annihilation of a nation and its people is neither justifiable nor productive. Such extreme viewpoints contribute to the cycle of hatred and violence, making peace even more elusive. 

India's approach, despite frustrations, has been to seek diplomatic and military solutions that preserve the potential for stability in the region. While the Indian government has faced challenges in addressing Pakistan's actions, it is essential to recognize the complexities of maintaining national security while also striving for long-term peace .

If war must be fought, it should end like a war -:

War is a ledger that must be balanced, not a loose note left to gather dust; let the book be

closed with clear terms and enforceable consequences. If you open a fight, you owe the world a

defined end state — ambiguity is the seedbed for future grief. Treating conflict casually is like

lighting a furnace without a flue; the smoke will find its way into every room.

A decisive close draws a clean line in the sand and tells posterity what was lost and what was

reclaimed. When states wrap up hostilities with clarity, they dismantle rumor mills and deny

spoilers the space to rebuild resentment.

Let strategy finish its work and let diplomacy sign the final page; half-measures leave wounds

that time will only widen. Ending a war properly is an austere, unsentimental act of

statesmanship that prevents cycles from looping again.

In war, there are no prizes for runners-up — only a victor.

The battlefield offers results, not consolation ribbons; it is an arena where outcomes are binary

and often brutal. Leaders must understand that war does not applaud effort; it records

consequences, plain and uncompromising.

Picture - There Is Always A Victor In The War As War Does Not Have Any Prize To Notify A Runners - Up 

Going in with hedged objectives is like stepping into a storm with an umbrella full of holes; you

will get soaked, and the ledger will still be written. If you choose to fight, prepare to take

responsibility for the entire bill, not just the parts you like.

This hard truth should shape doctrine and readiness: clarity of purpose prevents leaders from

swapping strategy for sentiment. When the stakes are existential, half-measures are the most

dangerous gamble .

Once a war rages, it cannot be treated as a whim.

Violence, once unleashed, behaves like a runaway tide — it scours institutions, economies, and

trust as it surges forward. You do not light that fire on a whim and then improvise the firefighting;

the aftermath will demand plans you did not budget for.

Every escalation nudges the world closer to unintended outcomes, and restraint and foresight

become the only reliable brakes. Decision-makers should weigh every step as though they are

setting off avalanches because the reverberations are rarely contained.

The act requires seriousness: strategy, readiness, and a clear doctrine of exit must walk hand in

hand. Treat conflict like a long, expensive ledger, and you might avoid writing a tragic deficit.

 Operation Sindoor was not merely an engagement; it was a clash of values.

Pic - Operation Sindoor Was A Clash For " MISSION, VISION AND VALUES " 

This action was read as more than geography and ordnance; it became a contest over what

behavior a responsible state would tolerate. On one hand, rhetoric invoked protection and

dignity; on the other, tactics raised disturbing ethical questions.

When a battlefield doubles as a moral mirror, the pictures that survive shape the public memory

and international reputation. Therefore, leadership must defend not only borders but also the

norms that preserve human dignity and civil order.

 How a nation conducts itself in war becomes the ink historians use to write its character; the

manner matters as much as the objective. Reputation is not a byproduct; it is the outcome of

choices made under pressure .

There is nothing prestigious about posture alone.

Pageantry and bluster are easy to stage; true prestige requires institutions and capabilities to

back up the show. A paper crown looks fine from a distance but crumbles under inspection.

When tested, hollow spectacles melt away; what remains is logistics, training, intelligence, and

the will to sustain operations. Real standing is earned in the long grind of competence, not in

momentary headlines.

Investments in people and infrastructure buy credibility; theatrics buy headlines that fade away.

If prestige is to mean anything, it must be purchased through steady performance and service to

the nation.

Combat does not negotiate with sentiment; it records force and consequence, and those without

capability find themselves pleading after the fact. Pleading is a reactive script; preparation is a

proactive strategy.

History shows that asking for mercy rarely rewrites outcomes; prevention and credible

deterrents do. Construct capability before conflict, or be prepared to trade away terms you later

regret.

Reliance on improvised and poorly equipped forces undermines credibility.

Recruiting the desperate into ad-hoc units buys immediate manpower but mortgages future

security. Although patchwork forces may fill the ranks, they often lack training, discipline, and

institutional continuity.

Professionalization, clear command structures, and accountability are the backbone of a

credible military; without them, morale frays, and missions fail. Turning to makeshift solutions

invites strategic failure and long-term instability in the economy.

Good defence policy digs foundations now so that emergency measures are not the script later;

invest in the basics and you cut down the temptation to improvise under fire.

Twenty-two minutes exposed how quickly an air campaign can destroy fixed assets.

Modern airpower operates at tempo; hardened sites can be neutralized in the time it takes to

brief journalists on the mission. This compression of time forces planners to think in terms of

minutes rather than days.

When destruction is that swift, redundancy, dispersal, and passive defenses become lifelines

rather than being afterthoughts. An asset that appears secure in peace can become vulnerable

in a matter of minutes.

Therefore, deterrence requires constant adaptation: intelligence, hardened shelters, and rapid

repair frameworks are the insurance policies of the modern age.

That arithmetic is unforgiving: leverage is held by those who can act, not by those who plead.

Military action that targets terrorist infrastructure also hits the narratives that sustain terrorism.

Striking safe havens and logistics erodes the physical scaffolding of violent networks and

chokes off their momentum. However, kinetic blows alone rarely suffocate a movement;

narrative and civic measures must follow.

Legal action, intelligence follow-up, rehabilitation of affected communities, and counter-

messaging are companion pieces to bombs and raids. Surgery without aftercare invites relapse;

dismantling the machine and starving the idea.

" When operations are paired with rebuilding and rule-of-law measures, they turn short-term success into lasting strategic gains ".

In the aftermath, the fog of information breeds competing claims and counterclaims.

Crises are fertile ground for competing narratives; in the vacuum, rumors rush in to occupy the

space. Without verified evidence, public conversation tilts toward noise rather than clarity.

Transparent, timely communication and independent verification are the antidotes to

misinformation; institutions that can prove facts will shape how history remembers an event.

Invest in verification mechanisms and a credible information pipeline so that the truth outlives

the initial roar of propaganda.

Appeals to third parties are a sign of diplomatic pressure.

Calling outside powers into the ring widens the theatre and brings leverage, but it also adds

more players to an already complex script. Mediation can cool immediate flames but can also

freeze the core dispute in ambivalent terms.

Use external partners strategically: to stabilize and create enforceable frameworks, not to paper

over structural weaknesses. Reliance on others should complement national competence and

not replace it.

When third parties engage, framing, timing, and technical credibility decide whether their input

stabilizes or complicates the resolution .

Warnings about catastrophic spillovers are a genuine diplomatic lever.

The risk of ecological contamination or nuclear accidents raises the stakes and forces the

attention of the international community. Such warnings are a tool to buy pause and inspection,

but they must be grounded in a technical reality.

If credible, they mobilize outside pressure and bring specialists to the table; if exaggerated, they

erode trust and make future appeals less persuasive. Transparency, independent assessments,

and clear mitigation plans ensure the effectiveness of these warnings.

 Diplomacy that leans on genuine risk must be accompanied by concrete plans for verification

and containment to avoid turning leverage into alarmism .

War diverts scarce resources from development to destruction.

Every unit of currency funneled into operations is a unit not invested in schools, hospitals, and

infrastructure that builds resilience. The fiscal and human cost compounds, hollowing out the

future as quickly as it answers present alarms.

The opportunity cost of conflict is often paid by the most vulnerable: health budgets shrink,

education stalls, and long-term growth falters. That is a debt that outlives any battlefield victory.

Therefore, strategy must pair any necessary military action with a reconstruction and

accountability plan that stitches the social fabric back together and prevents relapse.

That Is It and that speaks all about it 

.Regards and Thanks

Pics

Mr Shyamal Bhattacharjee, the author was born at West Chirimiri Colliery at District Surguja, Chattisgarh on July 6th 1959 He received his early education at Carmel Convent School Bishrampur and later at Christ Church Boys' Higher Secondary School at Jabalpur. He later joined Hislop College at Nagpur and completed his graduation in Science and he also added a degree in  B A thereafter. He joined the HITAVADA, a leading dailies of Central India at Nagpur as a      Sub-Editor ( Sports ) but gave up to complete his MBA in 1984 He thereafter added a Diploma In Export Management. He has authored SEVEN   books namely Notable Quotes and Noble Thought published by Pustak Mahal in 2001 Indian Cricket : Faces That Changed It  published by Manas Publications in 2009 and Essential Of Office Management published by NBCA, Kolkatta  in 2012, GOLDEN QUOTES on INSPIRATION , SORROW , PEACE and LIFE published by B.F.C Publications, Lucknow, , and QUOTES:: Evolution and Origin of Management Electives by Clever Fox Publishing, Chennai ,From Dhyan To Dhan :: Indian Hockey - Sudden Death Or Extra Time published by   BOOKS CLINIC  Publishing House , Bilaspur , Chattisgarh and his FIRST book on Hindi poem, which reads as        " BHED HAI GEHRA - BAAT JARA SI "   and  MIDAS TOUCH AND MIRACLES OF INDIAN SPORTS , published by Books Clinics , Bilaspur , Chhattisgarh,  

He has a experience of about 35 years in Marketing , and Business Analytics .